Council

Ward 1

6 To Be Elected

Mike Allen: No response.

Irfan Bangash: No response.

Funky Banjoko: No response.

Tiffany Bennett: No response.

Ty Brandt: My professional background provides a strong foundation for the role of a Council member, combining real world experience with a deep understanding of our community. My story in Fort McMurray began over 14 years ago when I arrived with little more than a backpack and a hockey bag, having sold everything to start over. I began in a wash bay and worked my way up, learning new skills and pieces of equipment along the way. This experience has given me a personal understanding of what it means to build a life here from the ground up. As a job steward and equipment operator, I have a firsthand grasp of the daily challenges and concerns of our working families. As a team lead in the membership development department of the International Union of Operating Engineers, I've honed my skills in leadership, negotiation, and making decisive choices under pressure. My role is centered on listening to the needs of our members and working to build consensus and a stronger team. These are exactly the skills needed to guide municipal initiatives and ensure efficient operations. Furthermore, my education in criminology, policing, and advanced forensics has equipped me with a unique and valuable skill set. I am trained in objective analysis, critical thinking, and meticulous investigation. These abilities allow me to scrutinize reports and proposals with a focus on accountability and transparency. I am uniquely prepared to examine complex municipal issues and ensure our community is well governed. Finally, my time as a Sergeant in the Air Cadets instilled in me a strong sense of discipline and a commitment to public service. It was the best organization/ Activity I ever participated in my youth. and gave me great skills at a young age This diverse blend of experience spanning hands on leadership, rigorous analysis, and a deep personal connection to this community positions me to be a highly effective and principled representative for the RMWB. My skills and story are precisely what's needed to ensure our community flourishes with strong, responsible governance.

Adam Bugden: I have been a firefighter/paramedic for 20 years within the municipality. I moved up the ranks to Acting Captain before I transitioned to a training officer. I have many leadership and instructing courses behind me, as well as, boots on the ground experience. I am also Emergency Management trained. I am also a facilitator for the Mental Health Commission of Canada, teaching First Responders signs and symptoms of PTSD and anxiety. It also works as an anti-stigma campaign. All of these things makes me well rounded and prepared for city council. I have a unique perspective when it comes to unions and management and how the relationships can be improved.

Lance Bussieres: No response.

Luana Bussieres: I have been a Social Worker for almost 4 decades and an Executive Director of a nonprofit and charity for 25 years. I understand policy, procedure, governance and operations extremely well. I know how to create policies that support strategic visions, supporting a safe work place culture and operational effectiveness. I am also very familiar with budget and audits although nowhere near the scale of the RMWB budget obviously. But I know how to decipher an audit. Critically, I know how to work collaboratively to solve complex problems, how to support people and how to listen to the voices of those we are here to serve.

Mila Byron: I am a seasoned lawyer and former Ward 1 councillor (2007) with firsthand experience in municipal governance. As a longtime resident, I understand the RMWB’s distinct challenges—from its resource-driven economy and remote geography to its history of natural disasters —and believes smart leadership must be rooted in fiscal discipline and responsibility to residents.

T.J. Carabeo: No response.

Darrel Chisholm: No response.

Yvette Desmarais: No response.

Koryn Dyer: No response.

Michael Ferrara: No response.

Allan Grandison: No response.

Wes Harris: No response.

KC Hutchins: I have grown up in the region for over 30 years, and along this journey I have had many different work experiences from retail, to restaurants, Canada Post employee of 3+ years, to a small business owner. These experiences have taught me how important it is to be a valued team player. Each job no matter how small leads to the overall success of a team or business. I have worked with many people and families over the years, and I value community connections through events, outdoors, sports, business and being good neighbours. I believe that I am well fitted to be a RMWB Ward 1 councillor as I genuinely care about the local community and supporting the people of all ages in our region to *

Christine Kindopp: I’ve lived and worked in Fort McMurray for over 25 years, and during that time I’ve taken on leadership roles with Acden Environment where I manage operations, budgets, and people. That work has really taught me how to solve problems, bring people together, and make decisions that have a direct impact on our community. I’ve also had the chance to serve on boards like the Friendship Centre and the Diversity & Inclusion Committee. Those experiences have given me a strong understanding of the challenges residents face and the importance of making sure everyone has a voice at the table. I think what ties it all together is that I bring both the practical, hands-on side of managing complex operations and the people-focused perspective of community work. That balance helps me look at issues in a fair, transparent way and focus on solutions that actually work for residents.

Nathalie Lefebvre: No response.

Joe MacNeil: No response.

Deborah Moses: I am the retired Chief of Staff of MP Laila Goodridge and I have been involved in the background of politics for 40 years. I have worked in all three levels of government: municipal, provincial and federal.

Verna Murphy: No response.

Clyde Alexander Phillips: No response.

Jared Sabovitch: No response.

Donald Scott: No response.

Dan Tulk: No response.

Ij Uche-Ezeala: No response.

Jennifer Vardy: No response.

Rene Wells: I bring a strong blend of public and private sector leadership that I believe is directly relevant to serving on Council. In senior management roles with two different organizations, I was responsible for overseeing multimillion-dollar operational budgets – the largest at $37 million – while ensuring that resources were used wisely and effectively. That experience reinforced my commitment to fiscal responsibility and to respecting taxpayer dollars. Here in Wood Buffalo, I have led teams in developing and updating legislation adopted by Council, including the Emergency Management Bylaw and the Vehicle for Hire Bylaw. These experiences gave me firsthand insight into how good policy is built – through stakeholder consultation, collaboration, and accountability. Beyond my professional career, I have actively served on numerous boards and committees for more than a decade, including three municipal committees I sit on today. That volunteer service has deepened my understanding of how local government works and the role Council plays in shaping policy that directly impacts our residents and businesses. Together, these experiences have prepared me to bring a balanced, practical, and community-focused perspective to the Council table.

Scott Wilson: No response.

Ward 2

2 To Be Elected

Kendrick Cardinal: No response.

Kurtis Girard: No response.

Russell Kaskamin: No response.

Greg (Cowboy) Marcel: No response.

Ron Quintal: No response.

Claris Voyageur: No response.

Ward 3

1 To Be Elected

Sarah Hollands: No response.

Stu Wigle: No response.

Ward 4

1 To Be Elected

Bob Galbraith: No response.

Kyle Vandecasteyen: No response.

Ward 1

6 To Be Elected

Mike Allen: No response.

Irfan Bangash: No response.

Funky Banjoko: No response.

Tiffany Bennett: No response.

Ty Brandt: The biggest issues facing the Wood Buffalo region are a contracting economy, a shift from major projects to maintenance work, and a reliance on fly in/fly out (FIFO) workers. These challenges have led to a significant loss of jobs, making it crucial to focus on fiscal responsibility and community well-being. I would approach these issues by first ensuring our municipality is fiscally disciplined. I would meticulously review budgets and proposals to find efficiencies and ensure every dollar is spent wisely. I'll push for transparency so the public knows exactly where their money is going. This community has always been a place where a good union job could drastically change your life for the better, even without a lot of formal education. People don't come to Fort McMurray just to survive; they come here to get ahead. With the recent economic shifts and the loss of major projects, that opportunity has become harder to find. We need to work to restore that promise. To address the economic changes, I'll advocate for policies that support our local workforce and small businesses. We need to diversify our economy to be less reliant on a single industry. I'll be a strong voice for our community at the provincial and federal levels, working to secure funding for new industries and projects that benefit our residents. Another pressing concern I've heard from many residents is the issue of animal care in our community. I'm aware that as a Council member, I can't directly provide money to individuals or businesses like veterinary clinics. However, I have a more advanced plan for how the municipality can support animal welfare. This plan, which I'll be unveiling soon, focuses on leveraging municipal resources and partnerships to address this issue in a meaningful way. I'll also champion policies that make housing more affordable and improve our quality of life through investments in parks and community services, and I'll advocate for proactive maintenance and support for all our communities.

Adam Bugden: Infrastructure, mental health access, small businesses, responsible fiscal spending. I will approach these issues head on and with an open mind. Being a training officer, it was my responsibility to fully understand the subject matte, so I could deliver the right message. I will approach policy the same. I will not make any decision without fully understanding the message.

Lance Bussieres: No response.

Luana Bussieres: The biggest issue for me is rebuilding and protecting the overall wellbeing of our community. I know people are feeling disconnected and uncertain about so many issues like the economy, housing, safety, physical and mental wellbeing and whether their voices really matter. It seems so broad and I understand that, but it is all interconnected. This all ties into restoring trust in our leadership to represent the voices and ensure strong service delivery and quality of life. As a social worker, I am trained to look at systems and not symptoms and how to respond in a coordinated, thoughtful and measured way. You can't solve one problem without understanding how it impacts another. The residents know the problems that they are experiencing and they are the ones who should lead our efforts. We need to listen, represent and work collaboratively to improve overall quality of life.

Mila Byron: Local government should focus on delivering the services people rely on every day—clearly, efficiently, and with input from the community. With responsible management, we can deliver well-maintained roads, safe sidewalks, and a communities that we can all be proud of.

T.J. Carabeo: No response.

Darrel Chisholm: No response.

Yvette Desmarais: No response.

Koryn Dyer: No response.

Michael Ferrara: No response.

Allan Grandison: No response.

Wes Harris: No response.

KC Hutchins: At the moment Fort McMurray is having issues with affordability, safety in school zones and some recreational area's, down turn of local economy, lack of jobs for youth and some adults, expensive commercial rental costs, and lack of seniors housing units. Collaboration within the city's departments to meet the citizens needs of my most committed priority for the municipality. Supporting local development and people is key to a successful community.

Christine Kindopp: The biggest issues I see in Fort McMurray and Wood Buffalo are affordability, housing, and community safety. We also need to make sure our infrastructure and services keep up with growth. My approach would be to work closely with residents, local organizations, and industry partners to find practical, long-term solutions that keep our community strong and sustainable.

Nathalie Lefebvre: No response.

Joe MacNeil: No response.

Deborah Moses: Economic development, youth jobs, community safety and lack of trust in council.

Verna Murphy: No response.

Clyde Alexander Phillips: No response.

Jared Sabovitch: No response.

Donald Scott: No response.

Dan Tulk: No response.

Ij Uche-Ezeala: No response.

Jennifer Vardy: No response.

Rene Wells: The biggest issues facing Fort McMurray and the wider region can be grouped into three areas: economic sustainability, livability, and accountable governance. First, our region is highly dependent on a single industry — the oil sands. While that industry will remain central to our prosperity, true growth requires industrial diversification. We need to actively attract and support ancillary and complementary industries that can broaden our tax base, create local jobs, and strengthen small business opportunities. This means unlocking land, streamlining permitting, and creating the right conditions for new sectors to invest here. Second, residents want a community that is safe, accessible, and vibrant. That means improving core services — from public safety to transit and infrastructure — while also ensuring families, seniors, and youth have amenities that improve quality of life. Greater focus must be placed on youth, including expanding local post-secondary opportunities that prepare them for careers here at home. Downtown revitalization, if done responsibly, should focus on bringing people and businesses back into the core, not simply subsidizing property owners. Finally, accountable governance is critical. Council must respect taxpayer dollars, prioritize essential services, and improve transparency in decision-making. Residents deserve clear, honest communication about where their money goes and the results being delivered. My approach would be to work collaboratively with Councillors, administration, and industry partners to ensure our region doesn’t just survive on one sector but thrives through smart planning, diversification, and opportunities that keep future generations here.

Scott Wilson: No response.

Ward 2

2 To Be Elected

Kendrick Cardinal: No response.

Kurtis Girard: No response.

Russell Kaskamin: No response.

Greg (Cowboy) Marcel: No response.

Ron Quintal: No response.

Claris Voyageur: No response.

Ward 3

1 To Be Elected

Sarah Hollands: No response.

Stu Wigle: No response.

Ward 4

1 To Be Elected

Bob Galbraith: No response.

Kyle Vandecasteyen: No response.

Ward 1

6 To Be Elected

Mike Allen: No response.

Irfan Bangash: No response.

Funky Banjoko: No response.

Tiffany Bennett: No response.

Ty Brandt: The role of a municipal government is to provide essential services and manage the local affairs of a community. This includes things like maintaining roads, providing water and sewer services, and supporting police and fire departments. A council's job is to focus on these core responsibilities to ensure the community runs smoothly and residents have a high quality of life. In my opinion, the Municipality of Wood Buffalo is currently doing too much. I've been physically attending Council meetings for over a year, and I've watched too much time being wasted on infighting and unnecessary bickering. It's frustrating to see time spent trying to educate councillors on what their role is, over three years into their term. At that point, it becomes unnecessary and a disservice to the community. I believe the organization as a whole is extremely top-heavy, and its HR structure and policies need a major overhaul. We've seen a number of serious issues come to light, and it’s clear there’s a fundamental problem. Our focus should be on getting back to basics. We need to prioritize our core services and be more fiscally disciplined. The municipality has been involved in projects that are outside of its main function, and by scaling back, we can ensure our tax dollars are used as efficiently as possible. This approach will make us more prepared for future economic challenges and allow us to provide the high-quality services our residents truly need. It’s about being responsible and doing the right things exceptionally well.

Adam Bugden: Our municipality is unique. We are in a bubble, so to speak. I feel that we have had some major improvements in our home, but there is still much work to be done. Once we have a cohesive council, we will be able to do more with what we have.

Lance Bussieres: No response.

Luana Bussieres: The role is to take care of core services first and foremost. But it is also about leadership and listening to the community and then appropriately planning for a strong and stable future as well. The Municipality has historically taken on a lot of responsibilities that lie with other levels of government. Frankly, they have had to in my opinion because the cost of not doing so and having residents go without those services is too high. Back to my broken record theme of collaborating and advocating. This is what needs to be done thoughtfully and strategically with other levels of government and it takes a team of diverse council members to do that with the Mayor. So council needs to lead locally but get those other intergovernmental partners to the table and owning their responsibilities. I believe we do too much yes, but out of necessity.

Mila Byron: I believe municipalities should not operate as bureaucracies, but as service providers accountable to the public. Local governments must be fiscally disciplined, transparent, and fully accountable to the people they serve.

T.J. Carabeo: No response.

Darrel Chisholm: No response.

Yvette Desmarais: No response.

Koryn Dyer: No response.

Michael Ferrara: No response.

Allan Grandison: No response.

Wes Harris: No response.

KC Hutchins: The role of a municipal government in to manage the Essential Services, Emergency Services, Infrastructure, Land Use and Development, community amenities, and local Governance. I think the municipality has kept up with development to a degree, but I believe there needs to be some adjustments and more priority on routine safety patrols in school zones and recreational areas where vulnerable citizen are. There needs to be more priority on seniors housing units and supporting local jobs rather than contracting service out from beyond our city, as well as progress in supporting the creation of bike and scooter lanes in our community.

Christine Kindopp: I believe the role of municipal government is to focus on the basics that directly impact people’s daily lives. Things like roads, water, waste services, recreation facilities, housing, and community safety. Municipalities are closest to the people, so they should be listening and responding to residents needs quickly and effectively. Right now, I think there are areas where the Municipality tries to do too much and spreads itself thin, while in other areas, residents feel services aren’t keeping up. I’d like to see us strike a better balance focusing on doing the essentials really well, while being open to partnerships and collaboration in areas where we can’t or shouldn’t be doing it all ourselves.

Nathalie Lefebvre: No response.

Joe MacNeil: No response.

Deborah Moses: Developing a safe and reliable community; enforcing by-laws and issuing permits; managing operations, capital and reserve fund budgets; listening to the residents. We need to have more community engagements of subjects that matter to the residents

Verna Murphy: No response.

Clyde Alexander Phillips: No response.

Jared Sabovitch: No response.

Donald Scott: No response.

Dan Tulk: No response.

Ij Uche-Ezeala: No response.

Jennifer Vardy: No response.

Rene Wells: The role of municipal government is to deliver the essential services that residents depend on every day – from safe roads and reliable infrastructure to emergency services, recreation, and community safety. Beyond that, Council’s responsibility is to set priorities that make our community livable for families, seniors, and youth, while creating the conditions for businesses and new industries to grow. I’ve heard clearly at the doors and online that residents are frustrated. Many feel the Municipality has tried to do too much in areas that don’t reflect their priorities, while not focusing enough on the fundamentals. Instead, we need experienced, proven leadership that respects taxpayer dollars and concentrates on practical solutions. Less politics, more progress. For me, that means focusing on what matters most – core services, economic diversification, and youth opportunities – and ensuring residents see real, tangible results. Council should always be grounded in accountability, collaboration, and transparency.

Scott Wilson: No response.

Ward 2

2 To Be Elected

Kendrick Cardinal: No response.

Kurtis Girard: No response.

Russell Kaskamin: No response.

Greg (Cowboy) Marcel: No response.

Ron Quintal: No response.

Claris Voyageur: No response.

Ward 3

1 To Be Elected

Sarah Hollands: No response.

Stu Wigle: No response.

Ward 4

1 To Be Elected

Bob Galbraith: No response.

Kyle Vandecasteyen: No response.

Ward 1

6 To Be Elected

Mike Allen: No response.

Irfan Bangash: No response.

Funky Banjoko: No response.

Tiffany Bennett: No response.

Ty Brandt: When we talk about property taxes, it's a complex issue because there are two sides to the coin: what we pay and what we get for our money. In terms of the raw numbers, the Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo has some of the lowest residential property tax rates in Alberta. When you look at how our rates compare to other cities, our tax rate is well below the provincial average. So, from a purely financial perspective, you could argue they are not too high. However, that doesn't tell the whole story. The question isn't just about the rate; it's about the value we receive. With the recent economic downturn and the shift away from major projects, many residents feel that the services and quality of life have not kept pace with the taxes they pay. We have an extremely top-heavy municipal administration, and too much tax money seems to be spent on administration and projects that aren't core municipal services. My position is that property taxes are currently just about right in terms of the rate, but the revenue they generate is not being used correctly. We can't simply raise taxes to cover our inefficiencies. The focus should be on ensuring every dollar is spent wisely and that our budget is streamlined to prioritize essential services. By cutting back on waste and re-focusing on our core responsibilities, we can ensure that our low tax rate translates into excellent value for the residents of Wood Buffalo.

Adam Bugden: Our property taxes are actually pretty comparable to the rest of the province. We should always reevaluate to ensure that our citizens are always being treated fair.

Lance Bussieres: No response.

Luana Bussieres: Our property taxes are some of the lowest in the province if not the country but I think this is something that can be continued given the industry tax dollars brought in. As council works to ensure other levels of government assume their responsibilities, I believe our low tax rate is actually sustainable--obviously coupled with smart municipal spending.

Mila Byron: Compared to other municipalities in Alberta, the RMWB's property taxes are actually on the low range of the scale. This is largely because we benefit greatly from industry, which bears the heavier burden of our tax load.

T.J. Carabeo: No response.

Darrel Chisholm: No response.

Yvette Desmarais: No response.

Koryn Dyer: No response.

Michael Ferrara: No response.

Allan Grandison: No response.

Wes Harris: No response.

KC Hutchins: I think property taxes are affordable.

Christine Kindopp: No response.

Nathalie Lefebvre: No response.

Joe MacNeil: No response.

Deborah Moses: RMWB has not increased property taxes in 2025. We will see an increase in educational taxes whether or not you have children in school.

Verna Murphy: No response.

Clyde Alexander Phillips: No response.

Jared Sabovitch: No response.

Donald Scott: No response.

Dan Tulk: No response.

Ij Uche-Ezeala: No response.

Jennifer Vardy: No response.

Rene Wells: Fort McMurray residents often feel their property taxes are high, but in fact we are among the lowest taxed jurisdictions in Alberta and across Canada. That’s important perspective, because it shows our challenges are less about the rate itself and more about ensuring residents see value for the taxes they pay. Where the situation is more complex is in the rural industrial tax ratio. Our rural non-residential tax class – which includes oil sands operations and camps – has historically borne a much higher share of the burden, with the rate peaking at 18.1:1 in 2016. Through provincial direction, that ratio has now come down to 6.21:1, and the expectation is it will eventually drop to 5:1, though no set date has been confirmed. As a Councillor, I would not support shifting a disproportionate burden onto local residents or small businesses. Our focus must be on responsible spending, transparency, and making sure taxpayers – regardless of class or category – feel they are receiving fair value for what they contribute. That also means a level playing field for businesses: programs like DRIP, which subsidize certain property owners at the expense of others, are not the right approach. The best long-term solution is to broaden our tax base through industrial diversification – attracting ancillary and complementary industries that can grow here, support small business, and reduce our dependence on a single sector. This means making smart choices today and building a sustainable, fair tax structure for the future.

Scott Wilson: No response.

Ward 2

2 To Be Elected

Kendrick Cardinal: No response.

Kurtis Girard: No response.

Russell Kaskamin: No response.

Greg (Cowboy) Marcel: No response.

Ron Quintal: No response.

Claris Voyageur: No response.

Ward 3

1 To Be Elected

Sarah Hollands: No response.

Stu Wigle: No response.

Ward 4

1 To Be Elected

Bob Galbraith: No response.

Kyle Vandecasteyen: No response.

Ward 1

6 To Be Elected

Mike Allen: No response.

Irfan Bangash: No response.

Funky Banjoko: No response.

Tiffany Bennett: No response.

Ty Brandt: The Municipality should increase its spending, but at a rate that is less than the rate of inflation and population growth. This approach shows fiscal discipline and a commitment to efficiency. Simply increasing the budget to match inflation and population growth would assume our current spending is efficient, which I believe is not the case. The organization is top-heavy and has too much waste. By increasing spending at a lower rate, we force the municipality to find efficiencies and prioritize what truly matters. At the same time, we can't afford to cut spending in absolute terms. A flat budget would likely lead to a reduction in services and could harm our infrastructure. We need to maintain our roads, utilities, and community facilities to ensure a high quality of life. The correct approach is to increase spending just enough to maintain essential services while forcing the organization to become more responsible and accountable with taxpayer money. This strategy allows us to improve our internal processes while still providing the services our residents depend on.

Adam Bugden: Responsible spending means keeping us above board. I don't feel overspending or underspending is an answer. As inflation rises and population increases, we will need to spend more to maintain our current way of life. However, we have a unique position where our municipality is without debt. That gives us an opportunity to improve our Municipal spending while maintaining fiscal responsibility.

Lance Bussieres: No response.

Luana Bussieres: I believe spending should generally be kept aligned with growth and inflation but my caveat would be any spending still needs to reflect actual needs and priorities. Core services have to be maintained. It has become clear these past years that there is significant infrastructure that was built without a clear view of the cost of maintaining it. That is going to factor in under the asset management plan. So essentially we need to spend smarter as well and focus on the value of investments of the tax dollars.

Mila Byron: Without further context that may otherwise augment a response, it is generally preferable that a municipality increase spending by less than the rate of inflation and population growth to ensure fiscal prudence while addressing essential needs.

T.J. Carabeo: No response.

Darrel Chisholm: No response.

Yvette Desmarais: No response.

Koryn Dyer: No response.

Michael Ferrara: No response.

Allan Grandison: No response.

Wes Harris: No response.

KC Hutchins: At this time, our municipality has already expanded Water Treatment & Waste Water Facilities, Parks and Recreational facilities, Land Use availability for development and infrastructure, and we had a major decline of population since the fire of 2016 and the flood. The people who live and work in our community need the municipality to increase spending on community programs and sustainable infrastructure and thus this will support a population growth in the future and transition all generations in our community properly.

Christine Kindopp: Property taxes are always a concern here. With the cost of living already high, many residents feel they’re not getting enough value for what they pay. For me, the question isn’t just whether taxes are too high or low, it’s about making sure the Municipality is spending responsibly, cutting waste, and focusing on services that matter most. When people see real value, the conversation around taxes changes.

Nathalie Lefebvre: No response.

Joe MacNeil: No response.

Deborah Moses: This really depends on whether or not we have a growth in population or a reduction in population. We can gradually increase spending based on inflation plus population growth each year over the next four years.

Verna Murphy: No response.

Clyde Alexander Phillips: No response.

Jared Sabovitch: No response.

Donald Scott: No response.

Dan Tulk: No response.

Ij Uche-Ezeala: No response.

Jennifer Vardy: No response.

Rene Wells: Over the next four years, I believe the Municipality must focus on spending smarter, not simply spending more. Residents and businesses alike expect Council to respect taxpayer dollars and deliver value for money, and that means aligning spending with real priorities, avoiding unnecessary projects and unneeded legacy projects, this to keep the tax burden as low as possible for everyone. I am particularly mindful of the lessons of the past. When the rural industrial tax ratio peaked at 18.1:1, Council engaged in spending that many saw as frivolous. That created frustration, especially among oil sands operators – our most important industry partners – and those concerns were later compounded by an adversarial approach to the camps that support their transient workforce. We cannot afford to repeat those mistakes. Instead, Council must work constructively with industry while balancing the needs of residents, investing responsibly in core services, and ensuring long-term financial sustainability. For me, that means keeping spending growth below the rate of inflation and population growth, focusing on efficiency, and prioritizing projects that strengthen livability and economic opportunity.

Scott Wilson: No response.

Ward 2

2 To Be Elected

Kendrick Cardinal: No response.

Kurtis Girard: No response.

Russell Kaskamin: No response.

Greg (Cowboy) Marcel: No response.

Ron Quintal: No response.

Claris Voyageur: No response.

Ward 3

1 To Be Elected

Sarah Hollands: No response.

Stu Wigle: No response.

Ward 4

1 To Be Elected

Bob Galbraith: No response.

Kyle Vandecasteyen: No response.

Ward 1

6 To Be Elected

Mike Allen: No response.

Irfan Bangash: No response.

Funky Banjoko: No response.

Tiffany Bennett: No response.

Ty Brandt: Money left over at the end of a financial year should be returned to taxpayers. I believe in a fiscally responsible government that works for the people. When the municipality finds savings in a budget, that money belongs to the taxpayers who contributed it. Instead of moving funds to a reserve account and then spending it on other projects, those savings should be returned to the community. A tax rebate is the most direct and transparent way to do this. It demonstrates to the public that we aren't here to grow the size of government, but to provide essential services efficiently. That being said, a reserve fund is a great rainy day fund for emergencies like floods and wildfires. A well-managed reserve is crucial for our community's resilience. However, the money for this should be allocated through a transparent, planned budget process, not by holding onto leftover funds. I also believe there are projects that could use extra funding. Saving money for these initiatives should also be done through a transparent budget process, not by holding onto leftover funds. Our focus must be on accountability. A rebate sends a clear message that we are committed to being responsible with the public's money, while also allowing us to thoughtfully consider and fund important initiatives through proper channels.

Adam Bugden: I'm not 100% sure on what the right answer is for this. I do believe we need to have reserves, however, if a certain area of our municipality needs more funding, we should have the option to allocate the funds where it is needed.

Lance Bussieres: No response.

Luana Bussieres: I think it should be saved for subsequent years as a way to balance spending over the long term so we can maintain or exceed service delivery levels and not increase taxes as we move to the 5:1 tax ratio and lose the amount of the industry tax base. This would be a way of returning the benefit to the taxpayers by maintaining quality of life and affordability. But I equally believe that if there is a constant 'savings' in budgets, the projections could be consistently off because it is rare to realize savings year after year after year. So budgeting may need to be tightened up in the first place.

Mila Byron: Ideally, surplus money at the end of a financial year should primarily be returned to taxpayers through a rebate, as it belongs to them, but a small portion may be prudently saved in a reserve for genuine emergencies, with clear transparency on its use. That said, there are pitfalls, such as (i) Equitable Distribution: Determining who qualifies for rebates can be contentious. Should rebates go only to property taxpayers, or include renters, businesses, or non-residents who contribute indirectly? Ensuring fairness across diverse groups is complex, (ii) Administrative Costs: Calculating and distributing rebates can incur significant administrative expenses, potentially offsetting the surplus. Small rebates may not justify the cost of processing; (iii) Data Accuracy: Inaccurate or outdated taxpayer records can lead to unequal or erroneous distributions, causing disputes or perceptions of unfairness; (iv) Timing and Communication: Delays in issuing rebates or poor communication about eligibility and processes can frustrate taxpayers and erode trust in the municipality; (v) Economic Disparities: Flat rebates may disproportionately benefit higher-income households, while lower-income residents might receive less relative to their tax burden; (vi) Structuring rebates to account for income or property value disparities is challenging; (vii) Political Bias or Perception: Rebates may be perceived as political tools to gain favor timed near elections, undermining trust in the process; and (viii) Impact on Future Budgets: Automatically issuing rebates could limit reserve funds for emergencies or infrastructure, creating fiscal instability if not balanced carefully.

T.J. Carabeo: No response.

Darrel Chisholm: No response.

Yvette Desmarais: No response.

Koryn Dyer: No response.

Michael Ferrara: No response.

Allan Grandison: No response.

Wes Harris: No response.

KC Hutchins: It's very important to have a rainy day "fund" for future years and demands that may develop. At the end of a fiscal year, surplus money should be used for the community needs.

Christine Kindopp: I think there has to be a balance. It makes sense for the Municipality to build healthy reserves so we’re prepared for emergencies, big projects, or downturns in the economy, that’s just good planning. But at the same time, residents need to see real accountability. If the Municipality keeps saying they’ve ‘found savings’ but then spends that money elsewhere, people lose trust. If there are consistent surpluses year after year, then yes, some of that money should be returned to taxpayers, either through lower rates or rebates. But we also need clear rules on when money goes into reserves and when it goes back to residents. For me, it’s about transparency and fairness people should know exactly how their tax dollars are being managed.

Nathalie Lefebvre: No response.

Joe MacNeil: No response.

Deborah Moses: Being fiscally responsible and factoring into account that unexpected expenditures may occur that are not budgeted for that year I believe it is always wise to put money into the reserve fund budget for such matters. We are also a community that helps our non-profits. However, I believe all financial audits need to be done in a timely manner.

Verna Murphy: No response.

Clyde Alexander Phillips: No response.

Jared Sabovitch: No response.

Donald Scott: No response.

Dan Tulk: No response.

Ij Uche-Ezeala: No response.

Jennifer Vardy: No response.

Rene Wells: When municipalities talk about ‘savings,’ residents are right to question where that money actually goes. I don’t believe in governments stockpiling taxpayers’ dollars into slush funds for frivolous projects. Savings should first be used to keep taxes as low as possible for both residents and businesses, especially as we prepare for the provincially mandated rural industrial tax ratio dropping to 5:1. That doesn’t mean reserves have no place. They are important when they are tied directly to long-term infrastructure, asset replacement, or true emergency needs. What I oppose is treating reserves as a backdoor to overspending or to justify new spending outside of Council’s priorities. For me, the priority is lower taxes, smarter reserves, and complete transparency in how year-end dollars are managed. Real relief for taxpayers won’t come from one-off rebates, but from sustainable growth in our revenue base. The way to achieve that is through industrial diversification – attracting new industries and businesses that broaden our tax base, support small business, and reduce our reliance on a single sector. Less politics, more progress means clear rules for reserves, no slush funds, and a long-term plan that respects taxpayers while building a stronger, more resilient economy.

Scott Wilson: No response.

Ward 2

2 To Be Elected

Kendrick Cardinal: No response.

Kurtis Girard: No response.

Russell Kaskamin: No response.

Greg (Cowboy) Marcel: No response.

Ron Quintal: No response.

Claris Voyageur: No response.

Ward 3

1 To Be Elected

Sarah Hollands: No response.

Stu Wigle: No response.

Ward 4

1 To Be Elected

Bob Galbraith: No response.

Kyle Vandecasteyen: No response.

Ward 1

6 To Be Elected

Mike Allen: No response.

Irfan Bangash: No response.

Funky Banjoko: No response.

Tiffany Bennett: No response.

Ty Brandt: For me, affordable housing means that housing costs don't exceed 30% of a household's income. It's about ensuring a full range of housing options are available to everyone, not just a select few. I'm not a huge fan of directly subsidizing income housing. My primary focus would be on keeping the cost of all housing from getting out of control. We can do this by partnering with developers and by reducing red tape to make it cheaper and faster to build homes. This approach increases the overall supply, which naturally helps to stabilize prices for everyone. Looking at Parsons Creek, it's clear that most of the development has been focused on single-family homes. Not enough smaller-sized homes for young families or childless couples have been built. In previous generations, entire neighborhoods of modular homes and trailers were quickly erected to support our rapidly expanding community. That can be done again, for way cheaper now, and it's a proven method for quickly increasing the supply of housing that fits the needs of a wider range of residents. My plan focuses on creating an environment where the private market can provide enough housing to meet the demand of our entire community, helping everyone get ahead.

Adam Bugden: I believe there is an answer for both. subsidized housing is very important. There are a lot of people who cannot afford to live and work here for numerous personal reasons. I feel we have a responsibility to help everyone who needs it in our municipality. Housing costs fluctuate with the market. That is usually out of the municipal scope of control. We can, however, advocate for our community to the provincial and federal government at every turn for our people.

Lance Bussieres: No response.

Luana Bussieres: Affordable housing' is housing where expenses that do not exceed 30% of the household income. Seniors housing, as an example (Rotary House, Legion Manor, Arabausca) The province is responsible for this program and it is delivered locally through Wood Buffalo Housing. Rental Assistance Benefit (RAB) is also available however income thresholds apply to all these benefits. I am not sure what definition 'lower-income' is referring to in this question because frankly a lot of people who are struggling are above provincial income thresholds. I would more information to answer this question properly. The scope and cost of any program the municipality could offer, if any, would vary greatly based on the definition used for 'lower income'.

Mila Byron: Affordable housing means ensuring a competitive market where housing costs are manageable for residents without excessive government subsidies. The municipality should focus on keeping housing costs under control by reducing regulatory barriers, streamlining permitting processes, and encouraging private development to increase supply. Subsidizing housing for lower-income residents should be limited to targeted, often temporary assistance for the most vulnerable, funded transparently without burdening taxpayers. A balanced approach prioritizes market solutions first, with minimal, carefully managed subsidies if needed resort.

T.J. Carabeo: No response.

Darrel Chisholm: No response.

Yvette Desmarais: No response.

Koryn Dyer: No response.

Michael Ferrara: No response.

Allan Grandison: No response.

Wes Harris: No response.

KC Hutchins: Affordable housing is needed in our community. There is a very large income gap for people in the region that may not work in the OIl and Gas sector. The municipality should have subsidized housing for low-income seniors and disabled or handicapped residents, as well as single parents.

Christine Kindopp: When I talk about affordable housing, I think of it as making sure people at every stage of life seniors, young families, workers just starting out can find a safe and reasonable place to live. For some, that does mean supportive or subsidized housing, because not everyone can afford market rates. But for the wider community, it’s also about making sure housing prices overall don’t spiral out of control. I think the Municipality has a role in both. We need to work with other levels of government and non-profits to make sure lower-income residents have access to housing they can actually afford. At the same time, we should be supporting smart development, cutting red tape, and working with builders so there’s enough supply to keep costs reasonable for everyone. It’s really about balance and making sure no one is left behind.

Nathalie Lefebvre: No response.

Joe MacNeil: No response.

Deborah Moses: We currently have the rent supplement program to assist with rent. Affordable housing should be made available for seniors as we do have a large aging population with all current places having wait lists. We can combine both to ensure seniors are being taken care of.

Verna Murphy: No response.

Clyde Alexander Phillips: No response.

Jared Sabovitch: No response.

Donald Scott: No response.

Dan Tulk: No response.

Ij Uche-Ezeala: No response.

Jennifer Vardy: No response.

Rene Wells: For me, affordable housing means residents finding safe, suitable homes without spending an unreasonable share of their income. I believe it’s important that each level of government stays in its own lane when it comes to housing. The federal government has a role in mortgage insurance and national housing data through CMHC. The provinces oversee social housing frameworks and tenancy laws. Municipalities, for their part, are responsible for land use planning, permits, and local development approvals – and those decisions have a direct impact on housing supply and costs. That’s where the Municipality can make the biggest difference: by streamlining approvals and ensuring we aren’t adding unnecessary costs for builders and residents. When municipalities try to step too far into provincial or federal responsibilities, it often leads to duplication, inefficiency, and frustration. My focus would be on ensuring a fair, efficient process that encourages housing development, helps stabilize costs, and supports a mix of housing options for families, seniors, and youth. Where lower-income housing is needed, the Municipality should work in partnership with the province, which has the proper mandate and resources. This means clear roles, faster approvals, and a focus on results that keep housing attainable for everyone.

Scott Wilson: No response.

Ward 2

2 To Be Elected

Kendrick Cardinal: No response.

Kurtis Girard: No response.

Russell Kaskamin: No response.

Greg (Cowboy) Marcel: No response.

Ron Quintal: No response.

Claris Voyageur: No response.

Ward 3

1 To Be Elected

Sarah Hollands: No response.

Stu Wigle: No response.

Ward 4

1 To Be Elected

Bob Galbraith: No response.

Kyle Vandecasteyen: No response.

Ward 1

6 To Be Elected

Mike Allen: No response.

Irfan Bangash: No response.

Funky Banjoko: No response.

Tiffany Bennett: No response.

Ty Brandt: Unions play a vital role in municipal operations, representing employees who provide essential services. I am pro-union and believe a healthy relationship between the municipality and its unions is crucial for a stable public service. However, this must be balanced with fiscal responsibility. I would ensure union negotiations don't compromise fiscal responsibility by insisting on a realistic mandate. We cannot promise what we cannot afford. Our bargaining position must be based on a thorough analysis of the municipality's finances. I would also seek a more collaborative relationship with our unions to find solutions that benefit both employees and taxpayers. I believe it was wrong for the previous Council to give themselves such a large raise for the incoming Council. This decision makes it much harder to ask for fiscal restraint from employees when Council has just given themselves a significant raise. This move was a disservice to the community and will make future negotiations challenging. The raise can be pulled back in a motion by a new Council. A responsible Council must be prepared to say no to demands that are not financially sustainable. My commitment would be to represent the best interests of the entire community, not just one group. Additionally, I believe our HR department needs a major overhaul. Millions of dollars have been wasted due to mismanagement of union members and grievances. This type of waste is unacceptable and directly impacts our ability to provide services to the public. My priority would be to address these deep-rooted issues to ensure our municipality operates efficiently and responsibly.

Adam Bugden: In my experience, unions do not typically ask for more than they need. If unions and the municipality work respectfully and with the mutual understanding that we need fiscal responsibility while maintaining a good quality of life for its members, I feel that we would come to mutual agreements better.

Lance Bussieres: No response.

Luana Bussieres: The staff are the life blood of municipal operations. Without them literally every aspect of our services would be impacted. From what I have gleaned from the outside looking in, negotiations between administration and the unions have been contentious for years. I genuinely don't believe it has to be this way and it's time for a reset. Council needs to set the tone and make it clear that 'our' people are valued. In social work we lean on collaborative and interest based models that break down the 'us vs them' or 'win-lose' barriers. It sounds idealist but it works as people focus on solving problems together and not fighting over a stance results in better outcomes, including financial ones. There are huge costs to a poor work culture and strained relationships including high absenteeism, staff turnover and mental wellness impacts on the team. Being respectful and fiscally prudent aren't incompatible.

Mila Byron: Public sector unions play a role in representing municipal workers, but their influence must not undermine fiscal responsibility or efficient operations. The municipality should negotiate with unions transparently, ensuring contracts prioritize taxpayer value by capping excessive wage increases, limiting unsustainable pension benefits, and tying compensation to performance and market standards. Steps include setting clear budget constraints before negotiations, involving independent fiscal oversight, and regularly reviewing union agreements to prevent long-term financial burdens, all while maintaining fair but disciplined labor policies.

T.J. Carabeo: No response.

Darrel Chisholm: No response.

Yvette Desmarais: No response.

Koryn Dyer: No response.

Michael Ferrara: No response.

Allan Grandison: No response.

Wes Harris: No response.

KC Hutchins: Public sector unions play vital role in collective bargaining, worker representation, advocacy for public services, policy, promote training and development , and supporting community Initiatives. I would utilize advice from Administration and Legal to ensure Union negotiations due not compromise fiscal responsibility.

Christine Kindopp: Unions are important for representing workers, but negotiations have to balance fair treatment with fiscal responsibility. I’d support open, respectful talks while making sure agreements stay affordable for taxpayers.

Nathalie Lefebvre: No response.

Joe MacNeil: No response.

Deborah Moses: Fiscal Management been set and budgets are currently in place. If any changes occur that will affect the budget the CAO can recommend to Council to use the Reserve Fund for this.

Verna Murphy: No response.

Clyde Alexander Phillips: No response.

Jared Sabovitch: No response.

Donald Scott: No response.

Dan Tulk: No response.

Ij Uche-Ezeala: No response.

Jennifer Vardy: No response.

Rene Wells: Public sector unions play an important role in representing their members and ensuring fair and safe workplaces. I respect that role and the principle of collective bargaining, which has long been part of how agreements are reached in Canada. Having worked closely with unions in both my RCMP leadership roles and later as a municipal director, I know that strong labour-management relationships are built on mutual respect, clear communication, and good faith. At the same time, Council has a duty to balance fair agreements with fiscal responsibility. Taxpayers expect their dollars to be managed wisely, and that means labour costs must be sustainable over the long term. My approach would be to support negotiations that are collaborative and transparent in process but always guided by the principle that agreements must be fair to employees and affordable to the community. This means avoiding unnecessary conflict, respecting the bargaining process, and ensuring outcomes that serve both the workforce and the residents who depend on municipal services.

Scott Wilson: No response.

Ward 2

2 To Be Elected

Kendrick Cardinal: No response.

Kurtis Girard: No response.

Russell Kaskamin: No response.

Greg (Cowboy) Marcel: No response.

Ron Quintal: No response.

Claris Voyageur: No response.

Ward 3

1 To Be Elected

Sarah Hollands: No response.

Stu Wigle: No response.

Ward 4

1 To Be Elected

Bob Galbraith: No response.

Kyle Vandecasteyen: No response.

Ward 1

6 To Be Elected

Mike Allen: No response.

Irfan Bangash: No response.

Funky Banjoko: No response.

Tiffany Bennett: No response.

Ty Brandt: While Council cannot directly control U.S. tariffs, they can help local businesses by focusing on what's within their control. I have always supported local businesses and would push for even more support local and buy local initiatives. It is important that any support offered applies not only to new businesses but also to our existing businesses. What's good for one should be good for all. Council can help businesses manage these impacts by focusing on local actions. They can help reduce costs by streamlining bureaucratic processes, such as permitting and licensing, to save businesses time and money. Targeted relief, like a specific grant or rebate program for businesses most affected by the tariffs, should be made available to both new and existing businesses. This ensures that the businesses that have been the backbone of our community are also supported during challenging times. Additionally, Council can serve as an advocate for the local business community by working with groups like the Fort McMurray Chamber of Commerce to lobby the federal government. This ensures the concerns of local businesses are heard by those who can influence trade policy. They can also launch a "buy local" campaign to encourage residents to support businesses in the community, which helps strengthen the local economy against external pressures.

Adam Bugden: There is a real issue with giving monetary help to small businesses within the municipality. If we give money incentives, that has to come from somewhere. If we can maintain an incentive program that doesn't translate into having to raise taxes for our people, I'm all for that.

Lance Bussieres: No response.

Luana Bussieres: The issues facing our businesses are complex and tariffs are only one factor of the challenges that they are dealing with. The reality is, it is not the job of Council to have all their answers. It is their job to ask the right questions, listen to the right people and to make smart and informed decisions. Groups like the Chamber of Commerce and Economic Development are the ones who are doing the work to hear from local businesses. They are the ones who collect the data and the impact stories and report to Council. To my point earlier about an engaged and connected Council, they need to stay connected to these conversations so they can take action based on what they are being told. Council needs to make sure barriers are not being created, they need to be prepared to repeal outdated policies and of course to cut red tape. Basically it is councils job to create the conditions that allow businesses, and the community in general, to thrive.

Mila Byron: Local businesses facing rising costs from U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods deserve support, but the Council's role should be limited to empowering the private sector rather than expanding government spending. I would advocate for federal and provincial-level action to resolve these trade disputes, as tariffs harm cross-border supply chains and inflate prices for everyone. Locally, the Council can help by streamlining permitting processes to speed up business expansions or relocations, cutting unnecessary regulations that add to operational costs, and facilitating low-cost networking forums where businesses can share strategies for diversifying suppliers or optimizing logistics. No new taxes or subsidies—true relief comes from unleashing entrepreneurship, not bureaucratic handouts.

T.J. Carabeo: No response.

Darrel Chisholm: No response.

Yvette Desmarais: No response.

Koryn Dyer: No response.

Michael Ferrara: No response.

Allan Grandison: No response.

Wes Harris: No response.

KC Hutchins: At this time, the exact amount of rising costs and supply chain challenges are just starting to add up. I think Council should monitor these costs, but create infrastructure to support community development that is sustainable and affordable.

Christine Kindopp: Even though tariffs are set outside our control, Council can still support local businesses by reducing red tape, keeping municipal costs fair, and encouraging residents and industry to buy local. We should also be strong advocates to other levels of government so our business community isn’t left carrying the burden alone.

Nathalie Lefebvre: No response.

Joe MacNeil: No response.

Deborah Moses: That's a tough question as the US tariffs are effecting everything throughout Canada

Verna Murphy: No response.

Clyde Alexander Phillips: No response.

Jared Sabovitch: No response.

Donald Scott: No response.

Dan Tulk: No response.

Ij Uche-Ezeala: No response.

Jennifer Vardy: No response.

Rene Wells: Trade disputes and tariffs are outside the control of municipal government, and I don’t believe in offering false promises or silver-bullet solutions. What Council can and must do is focus on the areas within our control that make it easier for local businesses to weather these challenges. That means streamlining permitting and approvals, reducing red tape, facilitating development throughout our region that make commercial rents more competitive, and ensuring our community remains an attractive place for people to live and work. By lowering local barriers, we can give businesses more room to adapt to global pressures like tariffs and supply chain disruptions. It also means continuing to listen to business owners, working with organizations like the Chamber of Commerce, and advocating to higher levels of government when local concerns need to be heard. My focus is on practical steps that improve the quality of life in our community while supporting the entrepreneurs who keep our economy strong. Less politics, more progress means being honest about what Council can do and then delivering those solutions with discipline and respect for taxpayers.

Scott Wilson: No response.

Ward 2

2 To Be Elected

Kendrick Cardinal: No response.

Kurtis Girard: No response.

Russell Kaskamin: No response.

Greg (Cowboy) Marcel: No response.

Ron Quintal: No response.

Claris Voyageur: No response.

Ward 3

1 To Be Elected

Sarah Hollands: No response.

Stu Wigle: No response.

Ward 4

1 To Be Elected

Bob Galbraith: No response.

Kyle Vandecasteyen: No response.

Ward 1

6 To Be Elected

Mike Allen: No response.

Irfan Bangash: No response.

Funky Banjoko: No response.

Tiffany Bennett: No response.

Ty Brandt: Reducing regulatory burdens is crucial for supporting small businesses and our local economy. Red tape and bureaucracy often make it difficult for entrepreneurs to succeed, and Council should be a partner in a small business's success, not an obstacle. I have spoken with multiple small businesses, and I have heard firsthand accounts of the challenges they face. Some have told me they had to wait up to six months for approval after signing a lease, paying rent the entire time while their doors remained closed. This kind of delay is unacceptable and a direct result of an inefficient system. I would advocate for a full review of all business permits and licenses, with the goal of eliminating unnecessary steps and speeding up approval times. I would seek a move towards a "one-window" approach, where a business owner can submit all required information in one place. I would also work to simplify our bylaws and regulations, making them easier to understand. Finally, I would push to eliminate redundant fees and charges that serve as a barrier for small businesses. By taking these steps, we can create a more business-friendly environment that encourages entrepreneurship, helps our local businesses succeed, and ultimately strengthens our community.

Adam Bugden: We should be open to discuss their fiscal burdens and be open to discuss options to help. This takes full transparency on both parts. When it comes to regulatory burdens placed on them by the municipality, we should be open to discussing how we can help. Once I get more information on the matters, I would be able to give you a more accurate response.

Lance Bussieres: No response.

Luana Bussieres: I will always come back to listening as a first response. Council needs to listen to the people who live the experiences every day. Businesses are the ones who know the barriers and the impacts and that is where the lead should come from. That of course means working with the groups mentioned above so there is a fulsome understanding by council about what is getting in the way. Following that, doing the job then creating a supportive business environment within the region.

Mila Byron: To support small businesses, the Council should reduce regulatory burdens by conducting a comprehensive review of municipal bylaws and eliminating outdated or overly restrictive regulations, such as excessive permitting requirements or zoning restrictions that hinder business growth. Streamline licensing and approval processes with clear timelines and a one-stop online portal to cut compliance costs may also be an option. Offer temporary property tax relief for new or expanding small businesses, funded by existing budget efficiencies, not new taxes. Encourage public-private partnerships to provide low-cost training or mentorship programs, helping entrepreneurs navigate challenges without direct subsidies. These steps empower small businesses to succeed through innovation and competition, not government handouts.

T.J. Carabeo: No response.

Darrel Chisholm: No response.

Yvette Desmarais: No response.

Koryn Dyer: No response.

Michael Ferrara: No response.

Allan Grandison: No response.

Wes Harris: No response.

KC Hutchins: Council can create grants to support small businesses and initiatives in our community.

Christine Kindopp: Council should be making it easier for small businesses to operate by streamlining permits, cutting unnecessary red tape, and keeping municipal fees fair. We already have the Small Business Support Program, and I’d like to see that expanded and better promoted so more business owners know it’s there to help them. Most importantly, we need to listen directly to small business owners about the barriers they face and work with them to create solutions that actually make a difference.

Nathalie Lefebvre: No response.

Joe MacNeil: No response.

Deborah Moses: Preference given to Canadian businesses; buy in bulk when possible in order to safe on costs. In large capital projects encourage prime contractor to have a clause that states a certain percentage of their workforce be hired locally.

Verna Murphy: No response.

Clyde Alexander Phillips: No response.

Jared Sabovitch: No response.

Donald Scott: No response.

Dan Tulk: No response.

Ij Uche-Ezeala: No response.

Jennifer Vardy: No response.

Rene Wells: Small businesses consistently tell me that red tape and regulatory delays are among their biggest frustrations. Having served on the Wood Buffalo Development Advisory Committee, I advocated for a client survey that invited permit applicants to provide structured feedback on their experience with municipal processes. That kind of transparency helps identify bottlenecks, eliminate unnecessary steps, and improve service. I believe this approach should not be limited to development permitting. It should be expanded across municipal departments where the public and businesses interact directly. By collecting regular, structured feedback, Council and administration can see where regulations are helping and where they’re hurting and make evidence-based decisions to reduce unnecessary burdens. For small businesses, every delay or excessive requirement adds cost. Streamlining processes and ensuring accountability would give entrepreneurs more time to focus on growth and innovation, not paperwork. This means listening to the people who use municipal services, and using their feedback to deliver faster, smarter, and more responsive government.

Scott Wilson: No response.

Ward 2

2 To Be Elected

Kendrick Cardinal: No response.

Kurtis Girard: No response.

Russell Kaskamin: No response.

Greg (Cowboy) Marcel: No response.

Ron Quintal: No response.

Claris Voyageur: No response.

Ward 3

1 To Be Elected

Sarah Hollands: No response.

Stu Wigle: No response.

Ward 4

1 To Be Elected

Bob Galbraith: No response.

Kyle Vandecasteyen: No response.

Ward 1

6 To Be Elected

Mike Allen: No response.

Irfan Bangash: No response.

Funky Banjoko: No response.

Tiffany Bennett: No response.

Ty Brandt: When addressing long-term climate commitments, I think the Municipality should focus on practical, achievable goals that directly benefit our community, rather than adopting aspirational targets like "net zero by 2050." These broad commitments are often set at the federal or provincial level and can be difficult for a municipality to control or fund, especially in a resource-based economy like ours. The priority for Council should be on affordability, public safety, and infrastructure, with climate-related actions being a secondary consideration. These core municipal responsibilities are what directly impact our residents' daily lives. When we focus on providing these services effectively, we build a strong, resilient community. This doesn't mean we should ignore climate change. Instead, we should integrate sustainable practices into our existing responsibilities in a way that makes sense for Fort McMurray. A great example of this is the new Public Works building across the bridge from downtown. By keeping equipment inside during the winter, it eliminates the need for extended warm up and run times, which is both financially and environmentally responsible. It's an excellent example of an efficiency initiative that also serves as a climate initiative. Ultimately, Council's role is to ensure our community is well-run, safe, and prosperous. Our approach to climate change should reflect this by focusing on local actions that are fiscally sound and that improve the lives of our residents.

Adam Bugden: Climate commitments are the responsibility for everyone. We, as a municipal government, are responsible to do our part for climate change. However, mandates are set by the provincial and federal government.

Lance Bussieres: No response.

Luana Bussieres: I believe this should be left up to the Federal and Provincial governments.

Mila Byron: The Municipality should avoid rigid, long-term commitments like “net zero by 2050” that risk locking in costly policies with uncertain economic impacts. Instead, Council should focus on practical, cost-effective environmental measures—such as improving energy efficiency in municipal buildings or encouraging private sector innovation—that don’t strain budgets or raise taxes. Climate change is a consideration, but affordability, public safety, and infrastructure are higher priorities, as they directly impact residents’ daily lives. Any climate initiatives must be transparent, locally relevant, and secondary to ensuring safe streets, reliable roads, and affordable living for taxpayers.

T.J. Carabeo: No response.

Darrel Chisholm: No response.

Yvette Desmarais: No response.

Koryn Dyer: No response.

Michael Ferrara: No response.

Allan Grandison: No response.

Wes Harris: No response.

KC Hutchins: No.

Christine Kindopp: Climate change is important, but Council’s role is to take practical, affordable steps locally, like energy efficiency and waste reduction while still keeping affordability, safety, and infrastructure as top priorities.

Nathalie Lefebvre: No response.

Joe MacNeil: No response.

Deborah Moses: The RMWB does not have a Net Zero by 2050 climate commitments. It really would be up for debate if that is how the RMWB would like to go.

Verna Murphy: No response.

Clyde Alexander Phillips: No response.

Jared Sabovitch: No response.

Donald Scott: No response.

Dan Tulk: No response.

Ij Uche-Ezeala: No response.

Jennifer Vardy: No response.

Rene Wells: I am focused on public safety, affordability, and infrastructure, because those are the issues I hear most often from residents. Of course, protecting our environment matters, but Council’s role is to strike a balance, ensuring our community remains livable and sustainable without compromising our long-term prosperity. Large-scale climate commitments like “net zero by 2050” are often best led by the federal and provincial governments, which have the jurisdiction and resources to drive those policies. At the municipal level, our focus should be on practical, achievable steps: maintaining high environmental standards in local development, investing in efficient infrastructure, and supporting initiatives that improve our quality of life while respecting taxpayers. For Wood Buffalo, the challenge is unique: we are both an economic hub for Alberta’s energy sector and a community where families, seniors, and youth live, work, and plan their futures. Balanced environmental policies help ensure our youth see this region not only as a place of opportunity, but also as a community they want to stay in long-term. As Councillor, I will support reasonable, aspirational goals – but always with an eye to balance, accountability, and ensuring we don’t sacrifice affordability or growth. Less politics, more progress means focusing on what we can achieve locally and doing it responsibly for today’s residents and tomorrow’s generations.

Scott Wilson: No response.

Ward 2

2 To Be Elected

Kendrick Cardinal: No response.

Kurtis Girard: No response.

Russell Kaskamin: No response.

Greg (Cowboy) Marcel: No response.

Ron Quintal: No response.

Claris Voyageur: No response.

Ward 3

1 To Be Elected

Sarah Hollands: No response.

Stu Wigle: No response.

Ward 4

1 To Be Elected

Bob Galbraith: No response.

Kyle Vandecasteyen: No response.

Ward 1

6 To Be Elected

Mike Allen: No response.

Irfan Bangash: No response.

Funky Banjoko: No response.

Tiffany Bennett: No response.

Ty Brandt: I believe Councillors should remain part-time. A part-time Council allows for a more diverse range of perspectives and experiences, which is vital for our community. I also believe that being elected to Council is about service to your community, not about a paycheck. A part-time model allows people with full-time jobs in our core industries, like tradespeople, business owners, and engineers, to serve the public. These individuals bring real-world, on-the-ground experience to the table, which is invaluable in a resource-based economy. A full-time position would likely exclude many of the community's best and brightest who are not willing to leave their high-paying careers for a full-time government job. A part-time Council also serves as a crucial check on the municipal administration. When councillors are not in the office all day, they maintain a degree of separation from the bureaucracy, allowing them to focus on big-picture governance. I've already spoken out about this issue. At one of the last Council meetings, I stood and spoke on this exact topic, advocating for the Council to remain part-time to ensure a more diverse group of people can be elected. The previous debate about Council's salary and the motion to make it full-time was a step in the wrong direction and a disservice to the community. Being a part-time Councillor is a significant time commitment, requiring hard work and dedication. However, I believe this balance is essential for effective, representative governance. The goal is not to have a Council that is on the job 24/7, but to have one that is effective, fiscally responsible, and truly representative of the people they serve.

Adam Bugden: Eventually, we should move to full time councillors as the community grows. However, if the work isn't being done by council, they should not get the benefit of full time.

Lance Bussieres: No response.

Luana Bussieres: A shift to full time needs to have considerable public engagement and a clear outline of expectations and what the benefits would be. One of my big concerns with moving to full time is I believe it would really impact the pool of who is able to run and that brings with it a host of additional concerns around the diversity of voices at the table. I would be open to considering a strong review and extensive opportunity for public engagement, but with the information I currently hold, I believe part time is the right model.

Mila Byron: Councillors should remain part-time to keep government lean and grounded in the community’s perspective, avoiding the creation of career politicians disconnected from taxpayers’ realities. Part-time roles encourage councillors to stay engaged in local businesses or professions, ensuring decisions reflect practical, real-world experience. The municipality can support councillors with reasonable stipends and administrative assistance to manage workloads without the high costs of full-time salaries and benefits. Transitioning to a full-time council risks inflating budgets and prioritizing political agendas over constituent needs, which is not in the best interest of fiscal responsibility or effective governance.

T.J. Carabeo: No response.

Darrel Chisholm: No response.

Yvette Desmarais: No response.

Koryn Dyer: No response.

Michael Ferrara: No response.

Allan Grandison: No response.

Wes Harris: No response.

KC Hutchins: I believe Councillors should be part time, and remain part time. As their duties are to the people's representation and the required hours to deliberate are an average of 20-25 hours per week. Additional meetings and community commitments are part of the jobs as well, but are most beneficial for communities connection as a extended requirement of this position.

Christine Kindopp: I believe Council should remain part-time. It keeps Councillors connected to regular work and community life, which helps them understand the challenges residents face. If the demands of the role grow to the point where part-time isn’t realistic, then we could look at a transition but it would have to be based on clear need, not just title or pay.

Nathalie Lefebvre: No response.

Joe MacNeil: No response.

Deborah Moses: Currently for the next 4 years they should remain part-time. If community engagement shows a need for full-time council members then that should be for any new term further down the road. As it is, there were council members elected who have no experience whatsoever in any form of governance.

Verna Murphy: No response.

Clyde Alexander Phillips: No response.

Jared Sabovitch: No response.

Donald Scott: No response.

Dan Tulk: No response.

Ij Uche-Ezeala: No response.

Jennifer Vardy: No response.

Rene Wells: Last year, Council voted 6-3 to make themselves full-time, effective the following day, despite legislation making it clear that such a change could only take effect for a new Council. After immense public pressure, one Councillor sought to withdraw support, and I spoke publicly against the original decision when it was brought back before Council. My concerns remain the same today. Moving to a full-time Council has significant implications for taxpayers, including added costs for office space, support staff, and salaries. None of those councillors supporting the original motion had campaigned in 2021 on making that change. To me, that speaks to the importance of exercising caution, involving the public, and benchmarking against other municipalities before contemplating such a change and making such a decision. I believe serving on Council, like policing or the priesthood, is a calling. Whether one is designated part-time or full-time, residents see their councillors in that role 24/7. Anyone who isn’t prepared for that reality may want to reconsider whether this is the right path for them. If there is to be a future discussion, it must be done transparently, with full public input and an independent arm’s length review of representation levels. Less politics, more progress means resisting self-serving decisions, respecting taxpayers, and ensuring residents have a real voice in how their government is structured.

Scott Wilson: No response.

Ward 2

2 To Be Elected

Kendrick Cardinal: No response.

Kurtis Girard: No response.

Russell Kaskamin: No response.

Greg (Cowboy) Marcel: No response.

Ron Quintal: No response.

Claris Voyageur: No response.

Ward 3

1 To Be Elected

Sarah Hollands: No response.

Stu Wigle: No response.

Ward 4

1 To Be Elected

Bob Galbraith: No response.

Kyle Vandecasteyen: No response.

Ward 1

6 To Be Elected

Mike Allen: No response.

Irfan Bangash: No response.

Funky Banjoko: No response.

Tiffany Bennett: No response.

Ty Brandt: Municipal elections are non-partisan. This means that, as candidates, we run as independents and are not officially affiliated with any provincial or federal political parties. This is by design, as the issues we deal with at the local level like roads, taxes, and bylaws should be decided based on what's best for our community, not on party politics. I am not a member of any political party, nor do I plan to join one. At some point since I was 18, I have voted for different political parties based on what I thought was right for me at the time. With that being said, I don't feel that any federal party represents my interests at all, and I do not align with them. However, I am pro-pipeline, pro-projects, and pro-firearms, which in our current situation makes me lean toward the Conservative Party, even though I do not agree with all of their policies. I am a huge proponent for individual freedoms and rights. My focus is entirely on the issues facing the residents of the Wood Buffalo region. I believe that being an independent candidate allows me to represent the best interests of the entire community without being influenced by a party platform or political ideology from Edmonton or Ottawa. My decisions as a Council member will be based on what is right for our community, plain and simple.

Adam Bugden: I am not affiliated with any political party. I look at the individual issues and react accordingly.

Lance Bussieres: No response.

Luana Bussieres: I am currently not affiliated with any political party. I held an NDP membership when Jack Layton was the leader of the party. I have had both Wildrose and UCP memberships as well. I voted Liberal in Fort McMurray when Mr. Germain ran because I believed he would best represent us. I am about good ideas, party politics. Despite being a social worker which are typically quite left leaning, I would consider myself more of a centrist.

Mila Byron: I am a proud conservative but I believe that municipal governance should remain focused on local issues like affordability, safety, and infrastructure, not partisan agendas. My conservative principles—favoring fiscal responsibility, limited regulation, and individual freedom—guide my approach, and party affiliations at the municipal level ought not risk dividing communities and prioritizing external politics over local needs. I’m committed to serving all residents with pragmatic, taxpayer-focused solutions, regardless of their political leanings.

T.J. Carabeo: No response.

Darrel Chisholm: No response.

Yvette Desmarais: No response.

Koryn Dyer: No response.

Michael Ferrara: No response.

Allan Grandison: No response.

Wes Harris: No response.

KC Hutchins: I support hard work and value community.

Christine Kindopp: I’m running as an independent because I believe municipal government should be about people, not party politics. My focus is on representing Fort McMurray and Wood Buffalo residents directly, listening to their concerns, and making decisions based on what’s best for our community not a party line. I’ve lived here for over 25 years, and my commitment is to serve the people here, regardless of political affiliation.

Nathalie Lefebvre: No response.

Joe MacNeil: No response.

Deborah Moses: Municipal elections are exactly that when being in a role of councilor your political affiliations should never come into play. You are to make decisions that benefit the whole of the RMWB!

Verna Murphy: No response.

Clyde Alexander Phillips: No response.

Jared Sabovitch: No response.

Donald Scott: No response.

Dan Tulk: No response.

Ij Uche-Ezeala: No response.

Jennifer Vardy: No response.

Rene Wells: I have been a member of both the federal Conservative Party of Canada and the United Conservative Party of Alberta, the former a highlight in local media coverage following the launch of my campaign. At the municipal level, though, I believe party politics have no place. The role of Council is to serve the whole community, and decisions must be made on their merits, not on partisan lines. My responsibility is to the residents I represent, not to any party. There has also been public discussion in this election over a “slate” of candidates. While provincial law currently only allows municipal parties in Calgary and Edmonton, the perception that outside groups may be attempting to influence the outcome of our local election. I am opposed to that. Municipal parties may make sense provincially or federally, but at the local level I feel this will create an adversarial system that undermines collaboration. Council must remain independent and focused on solutions that benefit everyone. Less politics, more progress means no slates, no partisanship – just accountability, independence, and practical leadership for the people of Wood Buffalo.

Scott Wilson: No response.

Ward 2

2 To Be Elected

Kendrick Cardinal: No response.

Kurtis Girard: No response.

Russell Kaskamin: No response.

Greg (Cowboy) Marcel: No response.

Ron Quintal: No response.

Claris Voyageur: No response.

Ward 3

1 To Be Elected

Sarah Hollands: No response.

Stu Wigle: No response.

Ward 4

1 To Be Elected

Bob Galbraith: No response.

Kyle Vandecasteyen: No response.